1. Seyfarth RM. A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys. J Theor Biol. 1977;65(4):671–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Silk JB, Beehner JC, Bergman TJ, Crockford C, Engh AL, Moscovice LR, et al. The benefits of social capital: close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival. Proc R Soc B. 2009;276(1670):3099–104. 10.1098/rspb.2009.0681 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL. The evolutionary origins of friendship. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:153–77. Available: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100337 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL. Affiliation, empathy, and the origins of theory of mind. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:10349–56. 10.1073/pnas.1301223110 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Seyfarth RM, Silk JB, Cheney DL. Social bonds in female baboons: the interaction between personality, kinship and rank. Anim Behav. 2014;87:23–9. [Google Scholar]
6. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL. Social cognition. Anim Behav. 2015;103:191–202. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.01.030 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Brent LJ, Chang SW, Gariépy JF, Platt ML. The neuroethology of friendship. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2014;1316(1):1–17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Brent LJ. Friends of friends: are indirect connections in social networks important to animal behaviour?Anim Behav. 2015;103:211–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Gero S, Gordon J, Whitehead H. Individualized social preferences and long-term social fidelity between social units of sperm whales. Anim Behav. 2015;102:15–23. [Google Scholar]
10. Connor RC, Krützen M. Male dolphin alliances in Shark Bay: changing perspectives in a 30-year study. Anim Behav. 2015;103(0):223–35. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.02.019 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Carter GG, Wilkinson GS. Cooperation and conflict in the social lives of bats In: Adams R, Pedersen S, editors. Bat Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation. New York: Springer Science Press; 2013. p. 225–42. [Google Scholar]
12. Archie EA, Moss CJ, Alberts SC. The ties that bind: genetic relatedness predicts the fission and fusion of social groups in wild African elephants. Proc R Soc B. 2006;273(1586):513–22. Available: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3361 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Smith JE, Powning KS, Dawes SE, Estrada JR, Hopper AL, Piotrowski SL, et al. Greetings promote cooperation and reinforce social bonds among spotted hyaenas. Anim Behav. 2011;81(2):401–15. Available: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Gersick AS, Cheney DL, Schneider JM, Seyfarth RM, Holekamp KE. Long-distance communication facilitates cooperation among wild spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta. Anim Behav. 2015;103:107–16. Available: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.02.003 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Holekamp KE, Dantzer B, Stricker G, Shaw Yoshida KC, Benson-Amram S. Brains, brawn and sociality: a hyaena's tale. Anim Behav. 2015;103(0):237–48. Available: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.01.023 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16. Fraser ON, Bugnyar T. The quality of social relationships in ravens. Anim Behav. 2010;79(4):927–33. Available: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.01.008 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Boeckle M, Bugnyar T. Long-Term Memory for Affiliates in Ravens. Curr Biol. 2012:1–6. Available: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.023 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
18. Fraser ON, Bugnyar T. Reciprocity of agonistic support in ravens. Anim Behav. 2012;83(1):171–7. Available: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.023 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
19. Massen JJ, Szipl G, Spreafico M, Bugnyar T. Ravens intervene in others’ bonding attempts. Curr Biol. 2014;24(22):2733–6. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.073 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Massen JJ, Pašukonis A, Schmidt J, Bugnyar T. Ravens notice dominance reversals among conspecifics within and outside their social group. Nature Comm. 2014;5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi V. A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Curr Biol. 2003;13(9):763–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Hare B, Tomasello M. Human-like social skills in dogs?Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9(9):439–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Emery NJ, Clayton NS. The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science. 2004;306(5703):1903–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Emery NJ, Seed AM, von Bayern AMP, Clayton NS. Cognitive adaptations of social bonding in birds. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2007;362(1480):489–505. Available: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1991 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL. Grooming, alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys. Nature. 1984;308(5959):541–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Barrett L, Henzi SP, Weingrill T, Lycett JE, Hill RA. Market forces predict grooming reciprocity in female baboons. Proc R Soc B. 1999;266(1420):665–70. [Google Scholar]
27. Hemelrijk CK, Ek A. Reciprocity and interchange of grooming and support in captive chimpanzees. Anim Behav. 1991;41:923–35. [Google Scholar]
28. Muroyama Y. Exchange of grooming for allomothering in female patas monkeys. Behav. 1994;128:103–19. [Google Scholar]
29. Watts DP. Reciprocity and interchange in the social relationships of wild male chimpanzees. Behav. 2002;139:343–370. [Google Scholar]
30. Gomes CM, Mundry R, Boesch C. Long-term reciprocation of grooming in wild West African chimpanzees. Proc R Soc B. 2009;276:699–706. Available: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1324 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Schino G, Aureli F. Grooming reciprocation among female primates: a meta-analysis. Biol Lett. 2008;4(1):9–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Fruteau C, Lemoine S, Hellard E, van Damme E, Noë R. When females trade grooming for grooming: Testing partner control and partner choice models of cooperation in two species of primates. Anim Behav. 2011;81:1223–30. [Google Scholar]
33. Tiddi B, Aureli F, di Sorrentino EP, Janson CH, Schino G. Grooming for tolerance? Two mechanisms of exchange in wild tufted capuchin monkeys. Behav Ecol. 2011;22(3):663–9. [Google Scholar]
34. Jaeggi AV, De Groot E, Stevens JM, Van Schaik CP. Mechanisms of reciprocity in primates: testing for short-term contingency of grooming and food sharing in bonobos and chimpanzees. Evol Hum Behav. 2013;34(2):69–77. [Google Scholar]
35. de Waal FB. Food transfers through mesh in brown capuchins. J Comp Psychol. 1997;111(4):370–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. de Waal FBM. The chimpanzee's service economy: Food for grooming. Evol Hum Behav. 1997;18(6):375–86. [Google Scholar]
37. Fruteau C, Voelkl B, van Damme E, Noë R. Supply and demand determine the market value of food providers in wild vervet monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:12007–12. 10.1073/pnas.0812280106 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
38. Dunbar R. Functional significance of social grooming in primates. Folia Primatol. 1991;57:121–31. [Google Scholar]
39. Aureli F, Preston SD, de Waal F. Heart rate responses to social interactions in free-moving rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): a pilot study. J Comp Psychol. 1999;113(1):59 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Shutt K, Maclarnon A, Heistermann M, Semple S. Grooming in Barbary macaques: better to give than to receive?Biol Lett. 2007;3(3):231–3. Available: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0052 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
41. Boccia ML, Reite M, Laudenslager M. On the physiology of grooming in a pigtail macaque. Physiol Behav. 1989;45(3):667–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Russell EM. Social behaviour and social organization of marsupials. Mamm Rev. 1984;14(3):101–54. [Google Scholar]
43. Forand KJ, Marchinton RL. Patterns of social grooming in adult white-tailed deer. Amer Mid Nat. 1989:357–64. [Google Scholar]
44. Wood MT. Social grooming patterns in two herds of monozygotic twin dairy cows. Anim Behav. 1977;25:635–42. [Google Scholar]
45. Kimura R. Mutual grooming and preferred associate relationships in a band of free-ranging horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1998;59(4):265–76. [Google Scholar]
46. Ophir AG, Crino OL, Wilkerson QC, Wolff JO, Phelps SM. Female-directed aggression predicts paternal behavior, but female prairie voles prefer affiliative males to paternal males. Brain Behav Evol. 2008;71(1):32 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47. Stopka P, Graciasová R. Conditional allogrooming in the herb-field mouse. Behav Ecol. 2001;12(5):584–9. [Google Scholar]
48. Kutsukake N, Clutton-Brock T. Social functions of allogrooming in cooperatively breeding meerkats. Anim Behav. 2006;72(5):1059–68. [Google Scholar]
49. Kutsukake N, Clutton-Brock TH. Grooming and the value of social relationships in cooperatively breeding meerkats. Anim Behav. 2010;79(2):271–9. [Google Scholar]
50. Russell JK. Altruism in coati bands: nepotism or reciprocity In: Wasser SK, editor. Social Behavior of Female Vertebrates. New York: Academic Press; 1983:263–90. [Google Scholar]
51. Hirsch BT, Stanton MA, Maldonado JE. Kinship shapes affiliative social networks but not aggression in ring-tailed coatis. PLOS One. 2012;7(5): e37301 Available: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037301 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
52. Matoba T, Kutsukake N, Hasegawa T. Head rubbing and licking reinforce social bonds in a group of captive African lions, Panthera leo. PLOS One. 2013;8(9):e73044 10.1371/journal.pone.0073044 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
53. Gill SA. Strategic use of allopreening in family-living wrens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2012;66(5):757–63. [Google Scholar]
54. Radford AN. Post-allogrooming reductions in self-directed behaviour are affected by role and status in the green woodhoopoe. Biol Lett. 2012;8(1):24–7. 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0559 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
55. Wilkinson GS. Social grooming in the common vampire bat, Desmodus rotundus. Anim Behav. 1986;34:1880–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56. Ancillotto L, Serangeli MT, Russo D. Spatial proximity between newborns influences the development of social relationships in bats. Ethol. 2012;118(4):331–40. [Google Scholar]
57. Kerth G, Almasi B, Ribi N, Thiel D, Lüpold S. Social interactions among wild female Bechstein's bats (Myotis bechsteinii) living in a maternity colony. Acta Ethol. 2003;5(2):107–14. [Google Scholar]
58. Ortega J, Maldonado JE. Female interactions in harem groups of the Jamaican fruit-eating bat, Artibeus jamaicensis (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Acta Chiropterol. 2006;8(2):485–95. [Google Scholar]
59. Arnold BD, Wilkinson GS. Individual specific contact calls of pallid bats (Antrozous pallidus) attract conspecifics at roosting sites. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011;65(8):1581–93. [Google Scholar]
60. Carter GG, Wilkinson GS. Food sharing in vampire bats: reciprocal help predicts donations more than relatedness or harassment. Proc R Soc B. 2013;280:20122573 Available: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2573 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
61. Aureli F, Schaffner CM, Boesch C, Bearder SK, Call J, Chapman CA, et al. Fission‐fusion dynamics. Curr Anthro. 2008; 49: 627–654. [Google Scholar]
62. Wilkinson GS. The social organization of the common vampire bat: I. Pattern and cause of association. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1985;17:111–121. [Google Scholar]
63. Kerth G, Perony N, Schweitzer F. Bats are able to maintain long-term social relationships despite the high fission-fusion dynamics of their groups. Proc R Soc B. 2011;278(1719):2761–7. Available: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2718 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
64. Wilkinson GS. Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat. Nature. 1984;308:181–4. [Google Scholar]
65. Carter G, Wilkinson G. Does food sharing in vampire bats demonstrate reciprocity?Comm Integr Biol. 2013;6(6):e25783 10.4161/cib.25783 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
66. Baron G, Stephan H, Frahm HD. Comparative Neurobiology in Chiroptera. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag; 1996. 1596 p. [Google Scholar]
67. Bhatnagar K. The brain of the common vampire bat, Desmodus rotundus murinus (Wagner, 1840): a cytoarchitectural atlas. Braz J Biol. 2008; 68:583–599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68. Kudo H, Dunbar RIM. Neocortex size and social network size in primates. Anim Behav. 2001; 62(4), 711–722. [Google Scholar]
69. Byrne RW, Corp N. Neocortex size predicts deception rate in primates. Proc R Soc B. 2004; 271(1549), 1693–1699. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70. ter Hofstede HM, Fenton MB. Relationships between roost preferences, ectoparasite density, and grooming behaviour of neotropical bats. J Zool. 2005;266(04):333–40. [Google Scholar]
71. Patterson BD, Dick CW, Dittmar K. Parasitism by bat flies (Diptera: Streblidae) on neotropical bats: effects of host body size, distribution, and abundance. Parasitol Res. 2008;103(5):1091–100. 10.1007/s00436-008-1097-y [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
72. Canty A, Ripley B. boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R package version 1.5. 2015.
73. Carter GG, Logsdon R, Arnold B, Menchaca A, Medellin RA. Adult vampire bats produce contact calls when isolated: acoustic variation between species, colonies, and individuals. PLOS One. 2012;7(6):e38791 Available: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038791 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
74. Carter GG, Skowronski M, Faure P, Fenton MB. Antiphonal calling allows individual discrimination in white-winged vampire bats. Anim Behav. 2008;76:1343–55. [Google Scholar]
75. Carter GG, Fenton MB, Faure P. White-winged vampire bats (Diaemus youngi) exchange contact calls. Can J Zool. 2009;87:604–8. [Google Scholar]
76. Williams CF. Social organization of the bat Carollia perspicillata (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Ethol. 1986;71:265–82. [Google Scholar]
77. Knörnschild M, Feifel M, Kalko EK. Male courtship displays and vocal communication in the polygynous bat Carollia perspicillata. Behav. 2014;151(6):781–98. [Google Scholar]
78. Fernandez AA, Fasel N, Knörnschild M, Richner H. When bats are boxing: aggressive behaviour and communication in male Seba's short-tailed fruit bat. Anim Behav. 2014;98:149–56. [Google Scholar]
79. Knörnschild M, Feifel M, Kalko EK. Mother–offspring recognition in the bat Carollia perspicillata. Anim Behav. 2013;86(5):941–8. [Google Scholar]
80. August PV (1979) Distress calls in Artibeus jamaicensis: ecology and evolutionary implications In: Eisenberg JF, editor. Vertebrate ecology in the northern Neotropics. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1979. pp. 151–159. [Google Scholar]
81. Ortega J, Maldonado JE, Wilkinson GS, Arita HT, Fleischer RC. Male dominance, paternity, and relatedness in the Jamaican fruit‐eating bat (Artibeus jamaicensis). Mol Ecol. 2003;12(9):2409–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82. Ortega J, Guerrero JA, Maldonado JE. Aggression and tolerance by dominant males of Artibeus jamaicensis: strategies to maximize fitness in harem groups. J Mammal. 2008;89(6):1372–8. [Google Scholar]
83. Kwiecinski GG, Griffiths TA. Rousettus egyptiacus. Mamm. Species. 1999:1–9. [Google Scholar]
84. Prat Y, Taub M, Yovel Y. Vocal learning in a social mammal: Demonstrated by isolation and playback experiments in bats. Sci Adv. 2015; 1(2), e1500019. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
85. Roberts G, Thomas NS. Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment. Nature. 1998; 394(6689),175–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
